Site selection
Data center site selection: build an evidence-based shortlist
PowerlandMap editorial team · Reviewed
How should a team shortlist data center sites?
Define the required IT load, deployment phases and delivery date, then compare candidates against the same evidence fields. PowerlandMap supports the first screening through sourced supply, mapped power infrastructure, timing and anonymised demand. A shortlisted location still needs project-specific technical, commercial and permitting diligence.
Start with a requirement that can be tested
Write a one-page brief before comparing locations. Separate initial and ultimate IT load, the intended commissioning dates, rack density, cooling requirements, resilience, connectivity and geographic constraints. A campus announcement and a deliverable first phase answer different questions.
For each requirement, record whether it is mandatory or negotiable. A candidate with a large ultimate campus figure should not outrank a smaller first phase that better fits the actual deployment. Keep any assumption about future expansion visible.
Use the same evidence table for every candidate
| Decision field | Evidence to request | What remains unresolved |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | IT MW, electrical import MW and phase boundaries | Whether space and power are available for this buyer |
| Power | Operator correspondence, connection stage and conditions | Deliverable capacity, reinforcement and energisation date |
| Land | Site boundary, title or control and permitted use | Rights, constraints and development agreement |
| Delivery | Planning position, design maturity and procurement programme | Dependencies and credible commissioning milestones |
| Commercial fit | Tenure, services, price basis and expansion rights | Binding offer and agreed allocation |
Record uncertainty alongside the ranking
Use separate fields for evidenced facts, analyst assumptions and outstanding questions. Record the source date and the date the evidence was checked. Where a value is missing, mark it as not documented rather than entering zero.
A useful shortlist explains why each candidate is retained, which condition could disqualify it and the next document needed. This is more actionable than a single score with no traceable reasoning. Review the ranking when a material grid, permitting or commercial assumption changes.
Apply the workflow in PowerlandMap
Start with the relevant markets and project stages, inspect capacity definitions, then use power context to focus the questions for operators and developers. Review available record sources and verification dates before circulating a shortlist.
Use the public coverage page to assess the scope of the monitored evidence and the fictional demo to inspect the workflow. Detailed records and analysis depend on the agreed subscription scope. Neither a map marker nor a platform match constitutes a confirmed development opportunity.
Common questions
- Does a listed site mean capacity is available to lease?
- No. A listed site may be operational, under construction or in development. Commercial availability needs a current confirmation from the operator or authorised seller.
- Can a platform replace site due diligence?
- No. It can organise screening and evidence review. Connection, land, design, permitting and commercial commitments must be verified for the specific project.
Sources and further reading
Public sources reviewed on 2026-10-09. Live product scope and coverage should be checked on the linked pages.